[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: Draft 2: Summary of discussion on draft-katz-yeung
I'd like to send this out soon. I'll wait and see
if anyone has comments till around 10pm tonight and
will send it out.
Thanks.
--
Alex
This is a forwarded message
From: Alex Zinin <alex.zinin@alcatel.com>
To: iesg@ietf.org
Cc:
Date: Friday, January 03, 2003, 5:11:19 PM
Subject: Draft 2: Summary of discussion on draft-katz-yeung
===8<==============Original message text===============
OK, here's the second version. Note that as agreed on the call, the
message is not speaking on behalf of the IESG, but rather myself as a
co-AD.
One question: in this discussion, Suresh is essentially questioning
correctness of what the WG has agreed on. Instead of saying "Suresh is
alone, and it's not enough to override the WG's consensus", I use the
wording of no consensus to support Suresh'es statement, plus state
that no show-stoppers have been found. Would this be fine, or should I
use a different approach?
Alex
[...]
===8<===========End of original message text===========