[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: privacy
In message <5.2.0.9.2.20030108123527.0205b0a8@popd.ix.netcom.com>, Richard Shoc
>
>Well I submit its time ..or at the very least I would suggest that there is
>consensus for a BOF in SF on "Where is the IETF going with Privacy issues?"
>
[non-iesg deleted]
Matt Blaze has been promising a "Privacy Considerations" draft; John
Morris from CDT has offered to help. Shall I lean on them to get
something ready for San Francisco?
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)