[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: privacy

Yes, please...much needed - we have this many places now
enum, geopriv (though John Morris has been great there)...

> In message <5.2.0.9.2.20030108123527.0205b0a8@popd.ix.netcom.com>, Richard Shoc
> 
> >
> >Well I submit its time ..or at the very least I would suggest that there is 
> >consensus for a BOF in SF on "Where is the IETF going with Privacy issues?"
> >
> [non-iesg deleted]
> 
> Matt Blaze has been promising a "Privacy Considerations" draft; John 
> Morris from CDT has offered to help.  Shall I lean on them to get 
> something ready for San Francisco?
> 
> 		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
> 		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)
> 
>