--On lørdag, januar 18, 2003 17:15:29 -0500 Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
wrote:
# 4 - since crankback has not received much IETF support I doubt it
will get on some IETF WG charter - so no real issue
Also, the document is CR-LDP and certainly there we do not
expect to add new things in IETF.
Scott,
can you explain to me in three words what crankback *is* (or point me to a
relevant description)?
the crldp-ason i-d assumes that it's a known term.