[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Agenda and Package for January 23, 2003 Telechat




		INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG)
      Agenda for the January 23, 2003 IESG Teleconference


1. Administrivia

   o Roll Call
   o Bash the Agenda
   o Approval of the Minutes
	- January 9, 2003
   o Review of Action Items

OUTSTANDING TASKS
	Last updated January 21, 2002
	
     o <draft-dfncis-netnews-admin-sys-04.txt> in Expert Review; Ned 
	  to evaluate. 
IP   o Allison to review draft-agrawal-sip-h323-interworking-reqs 
       and send decision to IESG. If OK, Steve/Secretariat to announce. 
IP   o Ned to write MIME and MEDIA TYPES Roadmap document 
IP   o Jeff to compare and contrast identity vs. identifier 
IP   o Erik to document process of how the IESG goes about asking 
       architectural questions of the IAB 
IP   o Thomas to write (or cause to be written) a draft on "how to 
       get to Draft". 
IP   o Patrik to take action on elevating RFC2279 to Standard. 
IP   o Thomas to contact Cablelabs to discuss formal relationship 
       with IAB 
     o Patrik to re-evaluate state of draft-irtf-idrm-handle-system (Informational) 
     o Patrik to re-evaluate state of draft-jaffer-metric-interchange-format (None) 
     o Erik to re-evaluate state of draft-jl-pcdp (Informational) 
IP   o Allison to re-evaluate state of draft-malis-sonet-ces-mpls (Request) 
     o Patrik to re-evaluate state of draft-new-apex-server (Informational) 
IP   o Ned to re-evaluate state of draft-tegen-smqp (Informational) 
IP   o Ned to re-evaluate state of draft-tiwari-appl-wxxx-forms (Informational) 
     o Thomas to get IESG's sign off for draft-stoica-diffserv-dps.  
       Secretariat to announce.
IP   o Secretariat to publish all liaison statements immediately.
     o Secretariat to have aliases for statements to ietf.org that goes 
       to ticket system.
IP   o Secretariat to include all IETF Secretariat action items on the 
       list.
     o Harald to compose note for draft-ietf-isis-traffic-04.txt.
     o Scott and Allison to confer on draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages
       and return next week with discussion points.
     o Secretariat to place 'lemonade' on new-work.
   
2. Protocol Actions

   o Intrusion Detection Message Exchange Format Data Model and Extensible
     Markup Language (XML) Document Type Definition (Proposed Standard)
        <draft-ietf-idwg-idmef-xml-09.txt>
     Token Bellovin, Steve

   o The AES-XCBC-MAC-96 Algorithm and Its Use With IPsec (Proposed  
     Standard)            
  	  <draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-aes-xcbc-mac-02.txt>
     Token Schiller, Jeff
     Note Responsible Jeff

3. Under discussion

   o The application/ogg Media Type (Proposed Standard)
        <draft-walleij-ogg-mediatype-08.txt>
     Token Mankin, Allison
     Note This MIME type registration needed documentation of the 
     medium - the Discuss was that the only type of resource was html 
     (and then I pointed out there was also source code) - anyway, now 
     there is an i-d, which is on this week's agenda. [Note from 
     Allison prior to 2002-Jan-23 IESG telechat]

4. Working Group Submissions

   o IP over Optical Networks A Framework (Informational)
        <draft-ietf-ipo-framework-03.txt>
     Token Bradner, Scott

   o Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Policy and 
     Certification Practices Framework (Informational)
        <draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-new-rfc2527-01.txt>
     Token Schiller, Jeff
     Note Responsible Responsible AD
 
   o Policy Requirements for Time-Stamping Authorities (Informational)
        <draft-ietf-pkix-pr-tsa-02.txt>
     Token Schiller, Jeff

   o Generic Requirements for Provider Provisioned VPN (Informational)
        <draft-ietf-ppvpn-generic-reqts-02.txt>
     Token Bradner, Scott

5. Individual Submissions

   o CR-LDP Extensions for ASON (Informational)
        <draft-aboulmagd-ccamp-crldp-ason-ext-02.txt>
     Token Bradner, Scott

   o The Ogg encapsulation format version 0 (Informational)
        <draft-pfeiffer-ogg-fileformat-01.tx>
     Token Allison Mankin
     Note This is the documentation IESG felt needed to go with the ogg 
     mime type registration...with this in hand, the ogg mime type should 
     be able to go forward - but this needs to go on the IESG agenda next 
     time (that is 2002-Jan-23)

   o Private Session Initiation Protocol(SIP) Proxy-to-Proxy Extensions 
     for Supporting DCS (Informational)
        <draft-dcsgroup-sipping-proxy-proxy-02.txt>
     Token Mankin, Allison
     Note For 2003-Feb-06 agenda 

6. Individual via RFC Editor

   o LDP and RSVP Extensions for Optical UNI Signaling (Informational)
        <draft-bala-uni-ldp-rsvp-extension>
     Token Bradner, Scott

   o IP Version 6 over MAPOS (Informational)
        <draft-ogura-ipv6-mapos-01.txt>
     Token Narten, Thomas
     Note minor questions/comments sent to authors
     Recommend IESG note along lines of notes attached to other MAPOS 
     RFCs.

7. Proposed Working Groups

   o License to Enhance Messaging Oriented Network Access for Diverse
     Endpoints
     Token Ned
     Note New title Enhancements to Internet email to support 
     diverse service environments (lemonade) and updated charter

8. Working Group News We Can Use

9. IAB News we can use

10. Management Issues

   o Basic MGCP Packages (Informational) 
   o IETF Meetings - avoiding overlaps 
   o Zorn Formal Appeal against IESG decision 
   o draft-ietf-idwg-idmef-xml 



                DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * 
                        INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG) 
                                January 9, 2003

Reported by Jacqueline Hargest, IETF Assistant Director

ATTENDEES 
--------- 
Alvestrand, Harald / Cisco 
Austein, Rob / IAB Liaison 
Bradner, Scott / Harvard 
Bush, Randy / IIJ 
Cotton, Michelle / ICANN 
Faltstrom, Patrik / Cisco 
Fenner, Bill / AT&T 
Hargest, Jacqueline / IETF 
Mankin, Allison / Bell Labs, Lucent
Narten, Thomas / IBM 
Reynolds, Joyce K. / ISI (RFC Editor)
Schiller, Jeff / MIT 
Wijnen, Bert / Lucent 
Zinin, Alex / Alcatel


REGRETS
------- 
Bellovin, Steve / AT&T Labs 
Coya, Steve / IETF 
Daigle, Leslie / Verisign (IAB)
Freed, Ned / Innosoft
Nordmark, Erik / Sun 



Minutes 
------- 
1. The minutes of the December 27, 2002 Teleconference were approved. 
   Secretariat to place in public archives.

2. Prior to the January 9, 2003 teleconference, the following 
   documents were APPROVED

   o 'The Group Domain of Interpretation' (Proposed)
        <draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-07.txt>  
   o 'LDAPv2 to Historical Status' (Informational)
        <draft-zeilenga-ldapv2-04.txt> 

3. Protocol Actions TENTATIVELY APPROVED

   o 'RTP Payload Format for SMPTE 292M Video' (Proposed Standard) 
        <draft-ietf-avt-smpte292-video-08.txt>
     Note Scott to send note.  Secretariat to announce.

4. Document Actions APPROVED

The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'Requirements for Resource 
Priority Mechanisms for the Session Initiation Protocol' 
<draft-ietf-ieprep-sip-reqs-03.txt> as an Informational RFC. 
Secretariat to send announcement.

5. Document Actions TENTATIVELY APPROVED

   o 'LDP and RSVP Extensions for Optical UNI Signaling' (Informational)
        <draft-bala-uni-ldp-rsvp-extensions-03.txt>
     Note IANA to review assignments for this and two other documents.  
     Once Thomas gives ok, Secretariat to announce.

6. Working Group Action

   o 'License to Enhance Messaging Oriented Network Access for Diverse 
     Endpoints' (lemonade) 
     Note Secretariat to place on new-work.

7. The following documents are still under DISCUSSION
 
   o 'A Presence Event Package for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)' 
     (Proposed Standard) 
        <draft-ietf-simple-presence-09.txt>
     Note Ned holds a "Defer".
   o 'IS-IS extensions for Traffic Engineering' (Informational) 
        <draft-ietf-isis-traffic-04.txt>
     Note Harald will compose a note.
   o 'Basic MGCP Packages' (Informational) 
        <draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages-09.txt>
     Note Scott and Allison to confer and return next week with 
     discussion points.

8. NEW Action Items

    o Scott to summarize discussion on the Osama document.
    o Thomas to get IESG's sign off for draft-stoica-diffserv-dps.  
        Secretariat to announce.
    o Secretariat to publish all liaison statements immediately.
    o Secretariat to have aliases for statements to ietf.org that goes 
        to ticket system.
    o Secretariat to include all IETF Secretariat action items on the 
        list.
    o Harald to compose note for draft-ietf-isis-traffic-04.txt.
    o Scott and Allison to confer on draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages
      and return next week with discussion points.
    o Secretariat to place 'lemonade' on new-work.

9. Outstanding Action Items

     o <draft-dfncis-netnews-admin-sys-04.txt> in Expert Review; Ned to 
       evaluate. 
IP   o Allison to review draft-agrawal-sip-h323-interworking-reqs 
       and send decision to IESG. If OK, Steve/Secretariat to announce. 
IP   o Ned to write MIME and MEDIA TYPES Roadmap document 
IP   o Jeff to compare and contrast identity vs. identifier 
IP   o Erik to document process of how the IESG goes about asking 
       architectural questions of the IAB 
IP   o Thomas to write (or cause to be written) a draft on "how to 
       get to Draft". 
IP   o Patrik to take action on elevating RFC2279 to Standard. 
IP   o Thomas to contact Cablelabs to discuss formal relationship 
       with IAB 
     o Patrik to re-evaluate state of draft-irtf-idrm-handle-system (Informational) 
     o Patrik to re-evaluate state of draft-jaffer-metric-interchange-format (None) 
     o Erik to re-evaluate state of draft-jl-pcdp (Informational) 
IP   o Allison to re-evaluate state of draft-malis-sonet-ces-mpls (Request) 
     o Patrik to re-evaluate state of draft-new-apex-server (Informational) 
IP   o Ned to re-evaluate state of draft-tegen-smqp (Informational) 
IP   o Ned to re-evaluate state of draft-tiwari-appl-wxxx-forms (Informational) 



To Internet Engineering Steering Group <iesg@ietf.org>
>From IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Reply-To IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject Evaluation draft-ietf-idwg-idmef-xml - Intrusion Detection 
	   Message Exchange Format Data Model and Extensible Markup 
	   Language (XML) Document Type Definition to Proposed Standard
--------

Last Call to expire on July 3, 2002

	Please return the full line with your position.

                    Yes    No-Objection  Discuss *  Abstain  


Harald Alvestrand   [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Steve Bellovin      [ X ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Scott Bradner       [   ]     [   ]       [ X ]      [   ] 
Randy Bush          [   ]     [   ]       [ X ]      [   ] 
Patrik Faltstrom    [   ]     [ XX]       [ D ]      [   ] 
Bill Fenner         [   ]     [ X ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Ned Freed           [ X ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Allison Mankin      [ X ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Thomas Narten       [   ]     [ X ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Erik Nordmark       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Jeff Schiller       [   ]     [ X ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Bert Wijnen         [   ]     [ X ]       [ XX]      [ D ]
Alex Zinin          [   ]     [ X ]       [   ]      [   ] 

 2/3 (9) Yes or No-Objection opinions needed to pass. 
 
 * Indicate reason if 'Discuss'.

DISCUSS
========
Scott note
      I would have thought that there should eb an IANA considerations
      section that at least points to sec 5 on how extensions
      can get made but also, I would have thought that sec 5 would
      have included what IETF proocesses (see RFC 2434) should
      be used to extend teh protocol

      I'm sensitive to this because we are getting a pile of
      requests to extend IETF protools (MPLS, RSVP etc) of
      late and we did not have any -must be extened within the
      ietf only- IANA mesage so we are being asked to OK
      some messy extensions - it woudl be good to cut this off at the
      pass and include such restrictions in new docs

Patrik
Yes, I should have discovered this earlier, but this last week has been 
too much. I just passed the document to the xml-directorate for review. 
I will send in a new ballot as soon as I get a response.

This imply I hope this only have to wait until say monday, and not next 
telechat before it can pass.

So, please, do the rest of the ballot!

Randy
needs to separate into at least two docs, the xml and transport model 
and the particular application

 xml-dir review comment

 1) There is too much description and teaching about XML and UML. The 
 document should merely reference the XML and UML standards and explain 
 the restrictions and/or extensions to those specs in the definition of 
 IDMEF.

 2) Section 3.3.4 mentions XML Schema and how they would one day use it. 
 Well, it has been out for awhile, so why aren't they? If they 
 switched from DTD's to XML Schema, they could probably get rid of half 
 of the data type sections (3.4.1 to 3.4.6) and their entire need for UML.

Bert
I think I had a Defer (after initially thought I would be noObj.

 But I need to rais a Discuss.

 Section 4.2.7.4.2 The SNMPService Class

 The description of this Class shows only how to deal with SNMPv1/v2c
 where authentication is done by (very weak) communitty String.

 WWWWWe just made SNMPv1/v2c Historic. Of course they are still in
 wide use, but SNMPv3 (which we just publsihed as STD 62) is already
 deployed at many places and will get more and more deployment.

 I think this document should recognize that and also address SNMPv3
 where we no longer have a community String.

 I also wonder if in the many examples on Pages 76 and folloing, if
 it is OK to use domain names and IP addresses as they do. In other
 words, do they violate one of our NITS
         Addresses used in examples should prefer use of fully 
	   qualified domain names to literal IP addresses, and prefer use 
	   of example fqdn's such as foo.example.com to real-world fqdn's 
	   See RFC 2606 for example domain names that can be used
         There is also a range of IP addresses set aside for this 
	   purpose. These are 192.0.2.0/24 (see RFC 3330). Private 
	   addressess that would be used in the real world should be 
	   avoided in examples. 

Let me add that the IPR section is also missing for this doc
that is targeted for STDs track.



COMMMENTS
==========
Ned
>To Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

> discuss

> ...

> 2) Section 3.3.4 mentions XML Schema and how they would one day use it.
> Well, it has been out for awhile, so why aren't they? If they
> switched from DTD's to XML Schema, they could probably get rid of half
> of the data type sections (3.4.1 to 3.4.6) and their entire need for UML.

This isssue is discussed in section 4.7 of
draft-hollenbeck-ietf-xml-guidelines-07.txt, recently approved as a BCP. 
This section makes it clear that either a DTD or a Schema based approach 
is permissible; neither one is inherently better than the other

     The choice of tool depends on the needs for extensibility or for a 
     formal language and mechanism for constraining permissible values 
     and validating adherence to the constraints.

I read this as saying that unless a case can be made that these needs 
aren't met by the chosen mechanism we should not be insisting they make a 
different choice.
                                                                Ned
Randy
i think the point is

both water and air are allowed. one may be better for washing your
car.
 


^L
To IETF-Announce;
Dcc *******
Cc RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>,
 Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, idwg-public@zurich.ibm.com
>From The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject Protocol Action Intrusion Detection Message Exchange Format 
	   Data Model and Extensible Markup Language (XML) Document Type 
	   Definition to Proposed Standard
-------------


The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'Intrusion Detection Message 
Exchange Format Data Model and Extensible Markup Language (XML) Document 
Type Definition' <draft-ietf-idwg-idmef-xml-09.txt> as a Proposed 
Standard. This document is the product of the Intrusion Detection 
Exchange Format Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Jeffrey 
Schiller and Steve Bellovin.
 
Technical Summary
   
Different elements of intrusion detection systems (IDS) need to
communicate with each other. This document defines a standard
data model, and implements it as an XML DTD.
   
Working Group Summary
   
There were no major issues with the document.
   
Protocol Quality
   
This document was reviewed for the IESG by Steve Bellovin.




To Internet Engineering Steering Group <iesg@ietf.org>
>From IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Reply-To IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject Evaluation draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-aes-xcbc-mac - The
	AES-XCBC-MAC-96 Algorithm and Its Use With IPsec to Proposed
	Standard
--------

Last Call to expire on August 6, 2002

	Please return the full line with your position.

                    Yes    No-Objection  Discuss *  Abstain  


Harald Alvestrand   [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Steve Bellovin      [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Scott Bradner       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Randy Bush          [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Patrik Faltstrom    [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Bill Fenner         [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Ned Freed           [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Allison Mankin      [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Thomas Narten       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Erik Nordmark       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Jeff Schiller       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Bert Wijnen         [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Alex Zinin          [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 

 2/3 (9) Yes or No-Objection opinions needed to pass. 
 
 * Indicate reason if 'Discuss'.
 
^L
To IETF-Announce;
Dcc *******
Cc RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>,
 Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
>From The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject Protocol Action The AES-XCBC-MAC-96 Algorithm and Its Use
	With IPsec to Proposed Standard
-------------


The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'The AES-XCBC-MAC-96 Algorithm
and Its Use With IPsec' <draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-aes-xcbc-mac-02.txt> as
a Proposed Standard.  This document is the product of the IP Security
Protocol Working Group.  The IESG contact persons are Jeffrey Schiller
and Steve Bellovin.

 
Technical Summary
 
 (What does this protocol do and why does the community need it?)
 
Working Group Summary
 
 (Was there any significant dissent? Was the choice obvious?)
 
Protocol Quality
 
 (Who has reviewed the spec for the IESG? Are there implementations?)




Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service environments
(lemonade)

 Proposed Charter
 ================

 Lemonade is tasked to provide a set of enhancements and profiles of Internet
 email submission, transport, and retrieval protocols to facilitate operation in
 environments which use Internet-based technologies but which have link
 characteristics, device characteristics, or service environments that are
 significantly different from those common on the Internet. A primary goal of
 this work is to ensure that those profiles and enhancements continue to
 interoperate with the existing Internet email protocols in use on the Internet,
 so that these environments and more traditional Internet users have access to a
 seamless service.

 Lemonade's work is at the crossroads of a body of work related to Internet 
 messaging, in particular work done by the VPIM, FAX, IMAPEXT and other IETF 
 working groups. Given the potentially broad scope of activities this group
 could engage in, the group will focus specifically on the following work items

           0. An informational RFC will be produced on LEMONADE requirements.

           1. Enhance the existing IMAP4 message retrieval protocol to satisfy the
                   requirements for streaming playback of multimedia content. 
                   
           2. Enhance the exsiting IMAP4 message retrieval protocol to facilitate
                   its use with devices that have limited capabilities such as mobile
                   endpoints. The existing standards-track CONNEG framework will be used
                   if content negotiation capabilities are needed.

           3. Create a message notification protocol for the specific purpose of
                   servers reporting message status information to other servers.

           4. Create a specification describing the use of Internet message
                   services in environments where message delivery may take place using
                   either Internet protocols or through an MMS server using
                   WAP to communicate with the receiving user agent.

 Any protocols defined by this working group will include appopriate security
 mechanisms, including authentication, privacy, and access control.
 Mandatory-to-implement security mechanisms will be specified as needed in order
 to guarantee secure protocol interoperability.

 The transport area will be consulted to deal with any transport-related
 issues that arise, especially in regards to items 1-4 above.
                           
 The working group is aware of several related activities in other groups

     - 3GPP TSG T WG2 SWG3 Messaging <http//www.3gpp.org/TB/T/T2/T2.htm>
     - W3C Mulitmodal interaction Activity <http//www.w3.org/2002/mmi/>
     - Open Mobile Alliance <http//www.openmobilealliance.org/>
     - 3GPP2 TSG-P <http//3gpp2.org/Public_html/P/index.cfm>
     - 3GPP2 TSG-N <http//3gpp2.org/Public_html/N/index.cfm>

 The goal is to coordinate efforts with at least these groups as required.

 While there is obvious synergy, given the end-of-life of the VPIM and FAX work
 groups and the similar membership, the working group does not expect to
 coordinate with these other groups.


 Milestones (document completion)
 ==========

 Feb 2003 - LEMONADE Requirements

 May 2003 - Server to server notification protocol

 Jul 2003 - IMAP4 extensions for VM playback

 Sep 2003 - IMAP4 extensions for mobile devices

 Jan 2004 - Translation to and from other messaging systems


 Drafts to be used as input for working group
 deliverables (grouped per milestone)
 ====================================

       LEMONADE requirements

           - draft-vaudreuil-um-issues-00.txt
           - draft-burger-um-reqts-00.txt
           - draft-wong-umcli-00.txt

       Server to server notification protocol

           - draft-shapira-snap-04.txt

       IMAP4 extensions for VM playback

           - draft-burger-imap-chanuse-00.txt
           - draft-nerenberg-imap-channel-01.txt

       IMAP4 extensions for mobile devices

           - draft-neystadt-imap-status-counters-00.txt
           - draft-shveidel-mediasize-00.txt

       Translation to and from other messaging systems

           - draft-vaudreuil-futuredelivery-00.txt