[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Documents for IESG consideration
In message <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155BAE362@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com
>, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" writes:
>So I had a discuss, and once the new draft shows up
>in the I-D repository I can remove my discuss.
>
>I think there were other who had a discuss, SMB ??
>
I'm happy with -17 of aaa-diameter. I don't think we've seen the other
document before, but it mostly appears to be an IANA-related issue. Do
we want to hand out code points like that for one release only?
Personally, I don't care much, but I thought there was concern about
such allocations never really going away.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
>> Sent: woensdag 22 januari 2003 18:40
>> To: iesg
>> Subject: Documents for IESG consideration
>>
>>
>> i will probably not make the call
>>
>> From: <john.loughney@nokia.com>
>> To: <randy@psg.com>
>> Cc: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Documents for IESG consideration
>> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:25:53 +0200
>>
>> Randy,
>>
>> Please consider moving forward the following documents:
>>
>> draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-17.txt, temporarily at:
>> http://www-nrc.nokia.com/sua/draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-17.txt
>>
>> and:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-loughney-aaa-cc-3gpp-01.txt
>>
>> thanks,
>> John
>> ------- end of forwarded message -------
>>
>
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)