RE: RFC-to-be: draft-bala-uni-ldp-rsvp-extensions-04

[Bala Rajagopalan <BRaja@tellium.com>]

Hello,

The Generalized UNI and the error code on
policy control failure are RSVP extensions.
The UNI IPv4 Session object and the Routing
problem error codes are based on RSVP-TE.
So, I think it probably wouldn't be precise
to call the whole lot RSVP-TE extensions.

Regards,

Bala Rajagopalan
Tellium, Inc.
2 Crescent Pl.
Ocean Port, NJ 07757
USA
Ph: +1-732-923-4237
Email: braja@tellium.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 3:06 PM
> To: Joyce Reynolds; iesg@ietf.org
> Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org; Bala Rajagopalan (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: RFC-to-be: draft-bala-uni-ldp-rsvp-extensions-04
> 
> 
> Joyce reacts to our (IESG) announcement:
> 
> >   *> The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'LDP and RSVP 
> >   *> Extensions for Optical UNI Signaling' 
> >   *> <draft-bala-uni-ldp-rsvp-extensions-04.txt> as 
> >   *> an Informational RFC.  This has been reviewed in the 
> >   *> IETF but is not the product of an IETF Working Group.
> >   *> 
> >   *> The IESG contact person is Scott Bradner.
> >   *> 
> > Folks,
> > 
> > Should that title be: 'LDP and RSVP-TE Extensions for Optical 
> > UNI Signaling'?
> > RSVP-TE is not RSVP.
> > 
> The Zhi Lin document does indeed use RSVP-TE
> So it might make sense. 
> 
> Bala?
> 
> Bert
> > Thanks, Joyce
> > (for RFC Editor)
> > 
> > 
>