[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RFC 3138 EGLOP (Re: Just FYI -- notes from RIR discussion)



FYI - this issue will apparently be raised in the RIPE LIR WG meeting here in Amsterdam today. It would be nice if we could tag someone with responsibility for figuring out what the IETF wanted to happen....

Harald

--On 28. januar 2003 06:11 -0500 Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com> wrote:

First issue -- Ray raises the problem with RFC3138 (extended
assignments in 233/8.  It is an informational RFC with no
IANA considerations.  The issue is that it says "allocations
to be made by RIRs", but they don't feel they were consulted
(published in June 2001).   RIRs may have to take it to their
membership (though Ray isn't yet convinced this is something
they need to take to membership).  At any rate, if they are
to do it, they need an IANA considerations to clarify
the process -- allocating one piece to each RIR, RIRs performing a joint
management function of the whole space, etc.

Harald asks how they handle global assignments (assignments
that are not obviously tied to a region).  Answer:  they act together (a
process is established per assignment).