[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: alcatel patent

To: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: alcatel patent
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 11:46:26 -0500
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, iesg-secretary@ietf.org
References: <E18g4XJ-0000HL-00@roam.psg.com><200302041528.h14FSCwV008375@newdev.harvard.edu>

>> i think we may have to do something about
>> http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2003/alcatel-letter.pdf
> what might we have to do?
> I'm confused because Alcatel says that the patent does not apply
> to the specific ieee case - I'm not sure how that applies to us

they have ipr in the general area.  who determines if it is near
us and they should file?  i would guess that we would like a similar
disclaimer or an ipr filing.

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: alcatel patent
  - From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
- Re: alcatel patent
  - From: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
- Re: alcatel patent
  - From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>

References:
- alcatel patent
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Re: alcatel patent
  - From: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Unicode Public Review Issues update
Next by Date: Re: sole-sourceing IANA function to ICANN for next 3 years (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: alcatel patent
Next by thread: Re: alcatel patent
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread