ps on rfc ed note for draft-allman-tcp-sack

[Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>]

oops I forgot one part of the RFC Ed note

here is an RFC Editor note for draft-allman-tcp-sack - with this
note the doc should be approved if Erik gives his OK

RFC Editor

plese replace the following paragraph in section 2:
    For the purposes of this specification we define a ``duplicate
    acknowledgment'' as an acknowledgment (ACK) whose cumulative ACK
    number is equal to the current value of HighACK, as described in
    [RFC2581].

with
    For the purposes of this specification we define a ``duplicate
    acknowledgment'' as a segment that arrives with no data and an
    acknowledgment (ACK) number that is equal to the current value
    of HighACK, as described in [RFC2581].


also - please add the IPR notices from Sec 10.4(A) and 10.4(B)
before the author's addresses