Re: draft-ietf-ptomaine-nopeer-01.txt

[Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>]

I'm also holding a discuss on this on and the rfc ed note
in my orignal discuss still holds

Scott

----
>From iesg-admin@ietf.org  Wed Feb 19 21:54:09 2003
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: comp
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: iesg-ballots
From: Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
To: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
Subject: draft-ietf-ptomaine-nopeer-01.txt
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:53:41 -0500
Sender: iesg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: iesg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: iesg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,
	<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <iesg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:iesg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,
	<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

This is an old draft on which I'm holding a DISCUSS.  Please change me 
to a no-ob conditional on the following change to the security 
considerations section via an RFC Editor's note:

	BGP by allowing the potential for
	^man-in-the-middle, session-hijacking, or^
	denial of service...

(This issue was raised in my original DISCUSS.)