Re: draft-ietf-ptomaine-nopeer-01.txt

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> I'm also holding a discuss on this

> note - this ID talks about a "proposal" but when its published as a BCP
> its more than a proposal

it is now going for info

> my issue can be cleared with the following (conceptual) RFC Ed note
> 
> dear RFC Ed please
> 
>     s/2. Proposal/2. NOPEER attribute/
>     s/The proposal/This memo/
>     s/The approach proposed here/The approach descibed here/
>     (I may have missed a few)
> 
>     change Security considerations to
> 
>     "The IANA should register NOPEER as a new BGP well-known
>     transitive community field"

ack

randy