RE: draft-ietf-ptomaine-nopeer-01.txt

["Michelle S. Cotton" <cotton@icann.org>]

Randy/Scott,

I'm home sick today so I don't have all my notes
with me, but looking at this again I was trying to
figure out if this will be a new registry or if
this new BGP well-known transitive community field
goes in an existing registry.

Can you clarify?

Thanks,

Michelle


-----Original Message-----
From: iesg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:iesg-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Randy
Bush
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:19 PM
To: Scott Bradner
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ptomaine-nopeer-01.txt


> I'm also holding a discuss on this

> note - this ID talks about a "proposal" but when its published as a BCP
> its more than a proposal

it is now going for info

> my issue can be cleared with the following (conceptual) RFC Ed note
> 
> dear RFC Ed please
> 
>     s/2. Proposal/2. NOPEER attribute/
>     s/The proposal/This memo/
>     s/The approach proposed here/The approach descibed here/
>     (I may have missed a few)
> 
>     change Security considerations to
> 
>     "The IANA should register NOPEER as a new BGP well-known
>     transitive community field"

ack

randy