Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hardie-wg-stuckees-00.txt

["The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman" <ho@alum.mit.edu>]

The way it's written it sound like too much stick and not enough
carrot.  How about having stuckee status be an award conferred by the
chairs, based on contributions?  Keep the list on the web page.  That
is, if chairs really want to do this much record keeping, policy
setting, and enforcement.

Item 10 seems very controversial.  Even if there are many informed
technical people supporting something, if the stuckees are divided
or ambivalent or uninterested, then the item cannot be considered a
consensus.  This seems too severe.

But, despite all the mechanism, I'm not sure what the advantage is
over having the chairs say, as they often do, "if no one is interested
enough in this work to comment on it, then we will seek dissolution of
the WG".  The stuckee method is just a very complicated way of getting
at the same idea ("the number of stuckees has fallen below the minimum
level for WG").

Hilarie