[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Last Call: Internet Printing Protocol (IPP): Event Notificati onsand Subscriptions to Proposed Standard
- To: "Hastings, Tom N" <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>
- Subject: RE: Last Call: Internet Printing Protocol (IPP): Event Notificati onsand Subscriptions to Proposed Standard
- From: ned.freed@mrochek.com
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 14:19:51 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: IANA <iana@iana.org>, Harry Lewis <harryl@us.ibm.com>, carl@manros.com, bob@herriot.com, "Hastings, Tom N" <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>, iesg@ietf.org, ned.freed@mrochek.com
- In-reply-to: "Your message dated Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:57:21 -0800"<E0BE13326C4EBC45BBC635197DEB7E3F86A3A5@x-crt-es-ms1.cp10.es.xerox.com>
- References: <E0BE13326C4EBC45BBC635197DEB7E3F86A3A5@x-crt-es-ms1.cp10.es.xerox.com>
> I've been traveling, but now I'm back. I can see from some of the confusion
> that the IANA section needs some clarification in
> <draft-ietf-ipp-not-spec-10.txt>. I've been working with Michelle on the
> existing IPP Registry and I still owe her a fully populated IPP registry
> that adds the items in RFC2911 and RFC2910.
> I've discussed your comments with Ira McDonald as well. See my replies
> bracketed by <tom> and </tom>. Most items I agreed with as well, so I've
> not included any comment on them.
> Because of the extent of the fixes to the IANA Considerations section, Ira
> and I think that it may be easier to republish another I-D for
> <draft-ietf-ipp-not-spec-10.txt>, rather than handling as a Note to the RFC
> editor. See if you agree.
I concur. This is really past the ability RFC Editor note to handle at this
point.
> And if we are doing one, we may as well do
> <draft-ietf-ipp-notify-get-08> and add the new IP section.
Yes.
> I'll try to get these out this week or the first of next week.
Great. Once that is done I'll put the document the IESG agenda for
discussion. Thanks.
Ned