[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IETF/JTC1 agreement approved by SC6
- To: iesg@ietf.org
- Subject: IETF/JTC1 agreement approved by SC6
- From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:42:55 -0800
- Cc: tli@procket.com, prz@net4u.ch
- In-reply-to: <001c01c2dc01$567f5a60$0701010a@jnet2000>
- References: <001701c26b72$7df4bc70$0701010a@jnet2000><104232256907.20021108112617@psg.com> <000b01c28bbe$106692c0$0701010a@jnet2000><78272261060.20021205180010@psg.com> <001101c29dbf$594391b0$0701010a@jnet2000><132711546029.20021220140335@psg.com> <000b01c2aa58$0ad8cea0$0701010a@jnet2000><146145492677.20030221110230@psg.com> <001c01c2dc01$567f5a60$0701010a@jnet2000>
FYI below. The agreement also passed the IETF LC.
I'll work with Jack on the next steps.
--
Alex
This is a forwarded message
From: Jim Long <Jim.Long@dial.pipex.com>
To: "Alex Zinin" <zinin@psg.com>
Cc: "Jack Houldsworth" <jhouldsworth@iclway.co.uk>
Date: Monday, February 24, 2003, 4:15:39 AM
Subject: Question on the agreement
===8<==============Original message text===============
Hi Alex,
Good news, SC6 approved the annexe without objection....I guess you and Jack
can work out the details of the "next steps" to actually activate the
agreement.
I have arranged for the text of IS 10589:2002 to be made freely available
via the www.jtc1.org website. See under "freely available JTC1 documents".
At the moment you get the old version, but I have requested that the JTC1 /
ITTF replace it with the 2002 version, and I had confirmation this morning
that they will do so.
Best wishes,
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Zinin" <zinin@psg.com>
To: "Jim Long" <Jim.Long@dial.pipex.com>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: Question on the agreement
> Jim,
>
> Just wanted to ping you wrt the agreement to see how it went.
>
> Also, I'm hearing the 2002 version of ISO 10589 has been
> approved. Do you think it would be possible to make the text
> available for the IETF community?
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> Alex
>
>
===8<===========End of original message text===========