Re: 3180+3138+1918=>666

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

do we actualky want to pursue?

randy

---

From: David Meyer <dmm@sprint.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: mboned wg <mboned@network-services.uoregon.edu>
Subject: Re: 3180+3138+1918=>666
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:15:06 -0800
>> and 3138 sez
>> 
>> 3. Assignment Criteria
>> 
>>    Globally scoped IPv4 multicast addresses in the EGLOP space are
>>    assigned by a Regional Registry (RIR).  An applicant MUST, as
>>    per [IANA], show that the request cannot be satisfied using
>>    Administratively Scoped addressing [RFC2365], GLOP addressing
>>    [RFC2770], or SSM.  The fine-grained assignment policy is left
>>    to the assigning RIR.
>> 
>> the registries want to know how the heck do they know from what
>> part of 1918 space each of them should assign.

	The idea was to free up the part of the (sparsely
	allocated) GLOP space for those who needed more than a
	/24. I had begun work with Michelle and Miriam on this
	when demand seemed to have wained. We can pick this up if
	there is demand.

	Dave