Re: Last Call: IANA Considerations for RADIUS to Proposed Standard

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

1) run the document as BCP, since he's right that it's not suitable for the 
three-level process, and BCP is definitely standards-track.
2) add the paragraph I suggested on the PREVIOUS round (intra-IESG) saying 
that the document allocates those codes, but doesn't document them.

                    Harald

--On 24. februar 2003 13:55 -0500 "Steven M. Bellovin" 
<smb@research.att.com> wrote:

> Assuming that Glenn's note is factually correct, what do we do?  He
> certainly seems to have a point about some of this, especially his
> complaints about type codes 29, 30, and 32.
>
> 		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
> 		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)