Hm, good point. However, the WG is a collection of people, and in this
phrasing, I'm referring to a "member" of that collection. I'm not sure it
implies "membership" to an organization. However, if the word "member"
throws people off, it could be called something else. Maybe "participant?"
Derek Atkins
<derek@ihtfp.com> To: pregen@egenconsulting.com
Sent by: cc: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>, owner-wgchairs@ietf.org, "T.J.
owner-wgchairs@ie Kniveton" <tj@kniveton.com>, wgchairs@ietf.org
tf.org Subject: Re: "Stuckees?"
02/25/03 12:37 PM
I think that "member" implies some level of "membership" -- but
the IETF doesn't have "members". What constitutes membership
in the IETF?
-derek
pregen@egenconsulting.com writes:
> I like "core WG members" a lot. That's kind of what we call ourselves
> anyway.
> ___________________
> Patricia Egen Consulting
> www.egenconsulting.com
> 423-875-2652
--
Derek Atkins
Computer and Internet Security Consultant
derek@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com