[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Stuckees?"
Hm, when emails are flying quickly, it pays to read notes. I just sent
another note in reply to Derik suggesting "participants". So, great minds
travel ....etc. 8-) So I vote for participants.
___________________
Patricia Egen Consulting
www.egenconsulting.com
423-875-2652
Brian Haberman
<bkhabs@nc.rr.com To: wgchairs@ietf.org
> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: "Stuckees?"
owner-wgchairs@ie
tf.org
02/25/03 12:44 PM
If we can't stay with Stuckees, Stuckies, or Stuckeys (sorry Steve),
then I would suggest that the term be "core WG contributors" or
"core WG participants".
Personally, I like stuckees. :)
Brian
Derek Atkins wrote:
> I think that "member" implies some level of "membership" -- but
> the IETF doesn't have "members". What constitutes membership
> in the IETF?
>
> -derek
>
> pregen@egenconsulting.com writes:
>
>
>>I like "core WG members" a lot. That's kind of what we call ourselves
>>anyway.
>>___________________
>>Patricia Egen Consulting
>>www.egenconsulting.com
>>423-875-2652
>
>