Re: Last Call: Registration Revocation in Mobile IPv4 to ProposedStandard

["Steven M. Glass" <Steven.Glass@sun.com>]

    This is my fault, as I'd wondered about the need for this, but 
wasn't 100% clear based on the text I read in the ID editor's 'nits' 
document (I can provide details on what I was confused about if 
necessary, but the specifics have already been swapped out of my brain).

    Do I need to provide the text for the section, or should I resubmit 
the document with this section.

                               Cheers,
                                   Steve


On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 04:53  PM, IANA wrote:

> IESG:
>
> The IANA has reviewed the following Internet-Draft which is
> in Last Call: <draft-ietf-mobileip-reg-revok-05.txt>, and
> has the following comments with regards to the publication of
> this document:
>
> In sections 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 there are 3 total TBAs by
> IANA.  However, there is no IANA Considerations section in
> the document.  This should be added to provide guidance to
> the IANA as to where the IANA should make these assignments
> and any other appropriate information.
>
> Please respond to the IANA about our concerns with regards to this
> document.  Failing to do so may cause delay of the approval and
> publication of your document.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Michelle S. Cotton
> (on behalf of the IANA)