RE: Last Call: Using IPsec to Protect Mobile IPv6 Signaling between Mobile Nodes and Home Agents to Proposed Standard

["IANA" <iana@iana.org>]

Jari,

It is not required to add an IANA Considerations section if there
are no IANA actions, but if you would like to, that's fine!

:)  Michelle


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:24 PM
> To: IANA
> Cc: iesg@ietf.org; jari.arkko@ericsson.com; vijayd@iprg.nokia.com;
> Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr; gab@sun.com; proberts@megisto.com;
> basavaraj.patil@nokia.com
> Subject: Re: Last Call: Using IPsec to Protect Mobile IPv6 Signaling
> between Mobile Nodes and Home Agents to Proposed Standard
> 
> 
> IANA wrote:
> > IESG:
> > 
> > The IANA has reviewed the following Internet-Draft which is in 
> > Last Call: <draft-ietf-mobileip-mipv6-ha-ipsec-03.txt>, and 
> > has the following comments with regards to the publication of 
> > this document:
> > 
> > We understand this document to have no IANA Actions.
> > 
> > Please respond to the IANA about our concerns with regards to this
> > document.  Failing to do so may cause delay of the approval and
> > publication of your document.
> 
> That's right. This document does not have any IANA considerations
> or actions, mainly because they have been treated in the companion
> document draft-ietf-mobileip-ipv6-20.txt. However, to make this
> clearer I'll add an empty "IANA Considerations" section and
> statement about it to the document. Ok?
> 
> Jari
>