[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: Using IPsec to Protect Mobile IPv6 Signaling between Mobile Nodes and Home Agents to Proposed Standard

To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi>
Subject: Re: Last Call: Using IPsec to Protect Mobile IPv6 Signaling between Mobile Nodes and Home Agents to Proposed Standard
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 01:40:29 +0100
Cc: IANA <iana@iana.org>, iesg@ietf.org, jari.arkko@ericsson.com, vijayd@iprg.nokia.com, gab@sun.com, proberts@megisto.com, basavaraj.patil@nokia.com
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 26 Feb 2003 01:23:47 +0200. <3E5BFB03.2020207@kolumbus.fi>

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   That's right. This document does not have any IANA considerations
   or actions, mainly because they have been treated in the companion
   document draft-ietf-mobileip-ipv6-20.txt. However, to make this
   clearer I'll add an empty "IANA Considerations" section and
   statement about it to the document. Ok?
   
=> according to ID-nits, the IANA section is required only when
there is an action for IANA which is not the case here.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr

References:
- Re: Last Call: Using IPsec to Protect Mobile IPv6 Signaling betweenMobile Nodes and Home Agents to Proposed Standard
  - From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: 3180+3138+1918=>666
Next by Date: Re: "Stuckees?"
Previous by thread: RE: Last Call: Using IPsec to Protect Mobile IPv6 Signaling between Mobile Nodes and Home Agents to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: last call - Draft Agenda - 56th IETF (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread