Re: last call - Draft Agenda - 56th IETF

[Colin Perkins <csp@isi.edu>]

There are a lot of people who have to attend both AVT and TSVWG, so moving
AVT won't work to Thursday 13:00 won't work. 

Colin



--> Black_David@emc.com writes:
>Loud objection: moving RDDP to 13:00 on Thursday creates an
>unacceptable conflict with TSVWG (this matters because that
>RDDP session is dealing with TCP framing).  RDDP could move
>to Thursday morning, 9:00 if that would help, but the transport
>ADs would need to sign off on having 3 TSV meetings in that
>timeslot, or perhaps AVT or TRIGTRAN could move to Thursday
>13:00.
>
>Thanks
>--David (RDDP WG chair)
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: James Kempf [mailto:kempf@docomolabs-usa.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 6:14 PM
>> To: wgchairs@ietf.org; bofchairs@ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org; Dinara
>> Suleymanova
>> Subject: Re: last call - Draft Agenda - 56th IETF 
>> 
>> 
>> So how about switching Seamboy and either IPR or RDDP on 
>> Monday morning? This
>> would put Seamboy on Monday and either IPR or RDDP at 13:00 on Thurs.?
>> 
>> Any objections?
>> 
>>             jak
>> 
>>