Re: last call - Draft Agenda - 56th IETF

["James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>]

Well, then, how about swithcing Seamoby and NSIS?

It is absolutely crucial that the folks from Seamoby have the opportunity to
attend the discussion in NSIIM.

            jak

----- Original Message -----
From: <Black_David@emc.com>
To: <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>; <wgchairs@ietf.org>; <bofchairs@ietf.org>;
<iesg@ietf.org>; <dinaras@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:22 AM
Subject: RE: last call - Draft Agenda - 56th IETF


> Loud objection: moving RDDP to 13:00 on Thursday creates an
> unacceptable conflict with TSVWG (this matters because that
> RDDP session is dealing with TCP framing).  RDDP could move
> to Thursday morning, 9:00 if that would help, but the transport
> ADs would need to sign off on having 3 TSV meetings in that
> timeslot, or perhaps AVT or TRIGTRAN could move to Thursday
> 13:00.
>
> Thanks
> --David (RDDP WG chair)
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Kempf [mailto:kempf@docomolabs-usa.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 6:14 PM
> > To: wgchairs@ietf.org; bofchairs@ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org; Dinara
> > Suleymanova
> > Subject: Re: last call - Draft Agenda - 56th IETF
> >
> >
> > So how about switching Seamboy and either IPR or RDDP on
> > Monday morning? This
> > would put Seamboy on Monday and either IPR or RDDP at 13:00 on Thurs.?
> >
> > Any objections?
> >
> >             jak
> >
> >
>