Re: last call - Draft Agenda - 56th IETF

["James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>]

Dinera,

The latest schedule looks fine. Thanx for all your effort.

            jak

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: <Black_David@emc.com>; <wgchairs@ietf.org>; <bofchairs@ietf.org>;
<iesg@ietf.org>; <dinaras@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: last call - Draft Agenda - 56th IETF


> Well, then, how about swithcing Seamoby and NSIS?
>
> It is absolutely crucial that the folks from Seamoby have the opportunity to
> attend the discussion in NSIIM.
>
>             jak
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Black_David@emc.com>
> To: <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>; <wgchairs@ietf.org>; <bofchairs@ietf.org>;
> <iesg@ietf.org>; <dinaras@ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:22 AM
> Subject: RE: last call - Draft Agenda - 56th IETF
>
>
> > Loud objection: moving RDDP to 13:00 on Thursday creates an
> > unacceptable conflict with TSVWG (this matters because that
> > RDDP session is dealing with TCP framing).  RDDP could move
> > to Thursday morning, 9:00 if that would help, but the transport
> > ADs would need to sign off on having 3 TSV meetings in that
> > timeslot, or perhaps AVT or TRIGTRAN could move to Thursday
> > 13:00.
> >
> > Thanks
> > --David (RDDP WG chair)
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: James Kempf [mailto:kempf@docomolabs-usa.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 6:14 PM
> > > To: wgchairs@ietf.org; bofchairs@ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org; Dinara
> > > Suleymanova
> > > Subject: Re: last call - Draft Agenda - 56th IETF
> > >
> > >
> > > So how about switching Seamboy and either IPR or RDDP on
> > > Monday morning? This
> > > would put Seamboy on Monday and either IPR or RDDP at 13:00 on Thurs.?
> > >
> > > Any objections?
> > >
> > >             jak
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>