Re: Last Call: IANA Considerations for RADIUS to Proposed Standard

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

i am not a good smtp relay!

From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: IANA Considerations for RADIUS to Proposed Standard
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:00:39 -0800 (PST)

Since I wasn't the one who suggested allocating the RFC2882 Type Codes in
the first place (Harald did), I have no objections to not allocating some
or all of them (other than 40-45, which are needed for draft-chiba).

Just let me know what the IESG would like to do.

On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Randy Bush wrote:

> ------- start of forwarded message -------
> From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Last Call: IANA Considerations for RADIUS to Proposed Standard
> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 13:55:35 -0500
>
> Assuming that Glenn's note is factually correct, what do we do?  He
> certainly seems to have a point about some of this, especially his
> complaints about type codes 29, 30, and 32.
>
> 		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
> 		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)