Re: Last Call: IANA Considerations for RADIUS to Proposed Standard

[Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>]

Since the RFC 2882 Types Codes were added to the allocation in
response to an IESG comment, I'd be happy to remove some of them,
if that's what is deemed appropriate. An alternative to removing them
entirely would be to enumerate them and say that those Type Codes are
allocated last.

> Assuming that Glenn's note is factually correct, what do we do?  He
> certainly seems to have a point about some of this, especially his
> complaints about type codes 29, 30, and 32.
>
> 		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
> 		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)