[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: addr-arch next steps

To: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: addr-arch next steps
From: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:11:14 -0500
In-reply-to: <200302282125.h1SLPSj6029778@newdev.harvard.edu>
References: <E18oc5U-000ILr-00@roam.psg.com><200302282125.h1SLPSj6029778@newdev.harvard.edu>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.8.1 (Something) Emacs/20.7 Mule/4.0 (HANANOEN)

At Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:25:28 -0500 (EST), Scott Bradner wrote:
> 
> > and we should ignore the iab saying the document sucks?  
> 
> the IAB said (in effect) that it did not suck so bad that it should
> not be published as PS

In case it's not obvious: RFC 2026, page 12, last paragraph.

References:
- Re: addr-arch next steps
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Re: addr-arch next steps
  - From: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: another role for the nomcom?
Next by Date: RE: [ietf-provreg] FYI: EPP implementation by the Polish registry
Previous by thread: Re: addr-arch next steps
Next by thread: Laugh Test: Next Steps in Mobility BOF [nsiim] Request
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread