[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft note to IPv6 WG on DNS discovery

To: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: draft note to IPv6 WG on DNS discovery
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 10:27:17 -0500
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Bob Hinden <hinden@iprg.nokia.com>, iesg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: Message from mrw@windriver.com of "Wed, 05 Mar 2003 09:10:32 EST." <5.1.0.14.2.20030305090931.045f7dc8@mail.windriver.com>

> So, let's get the topic of DNS resolver autoconfiguration started
> somewhere else -- is dnsext or dnsop a better choice?

Dnsop, I suspect. Dnsext is for changes to the DNS. AFAIK, no DNS
changes/extensions are being pursued.

dnsop is presumably where folk that run DNS servers and are familiar
with operational issues actually reside. This community should
presumably be supporting the work, if it is to go forward.

Thomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: draft note to IPv6 WG on DNS discovery
  - From: Bob Hinden <hinden@iprg.nokia.com>

References:
- Re: draft note to IPv6 WG on DNS discovery
  - From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>

Prev by Date: Re: draft note to IPv6 WG on DNS discovery
Next by Date: UPDATE: IESG Telechat for March 6, 2003
Previous by thread: Re: draft note to IPv6 WG on DNS discovery
Next by thread: Re: draft note to IPv6 WG on DNS discovery
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread