Thanks, Randy! I think it is important that we all get on the same page and start correcting each other when we fall off of it... (I'm a prime offender). The IPv6 WG needs to go away. We are trying to get a charter that will allow us to finish up a few important things (MIBs, fix doc inconsistencies, etc.) and get our core specs to DS. Then, we should go on hiatus until something needs to be done to the IPv6 documents (move others to DS, move some to FS, or whatever). To make this happen, we need to start pursuing all new IPv6 work in the appropriate places in the IETF -- the same places we'd do the work if there were no IPv6 WG, just like we do for IPv4-related things.