RE: draft-ietf-ppvpn-requirements-05.txt

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

--On torsdag, mars 06, 2003 16:34:10 +0100 "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" 
<bwijnen@lucent.com> wrote:

> Inline
> > > RFC1777 is HISTORIC (as per RFC3494).
> >
> > can we fix that with an RFC ed note?
> Sure. Propose one.
Here's a proposal.... better mention it to the authors first; it 
occasionally happens that people WANT to refer to LDAPv2 (happened in 
PKIX), but when that happens, it's usually a far more intimate reference; I 
don't think these people care about the difference.

RFC Editor:

Please replace all references to RFC 1777 (LDAPv2) with a reference to RFC 
3377 (LDAPv3).

There are two references of the form [RFC1777] in section 3.7 of the 
document, and one reference in the references section.