[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [iesg-secretary #5788] FW: draft-ietf-forces-requirements-08

To: "Jacqueline Hargest" <jhargest@foretec.com>
Subject: Re: [iesg-secretary #5788] FW: draft-ietf-forces-requirements-08
From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:18:18 -0800
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200303080103.h2813MQ10824@inet.foretec.com>
References: <200303080103.h2813MQ10824@inet.foretec.com>

Jacqueline,

 it didn't have to go to you, my mistake.

-- 
Alex

Friday, March 7, 2003, 5:03:22 PM, Jacqueline Hargest wrote:
> Your request #5788 was resolved by jhargest:

> IESG: FYI

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
>>To: "Putzolu, David" <david.putzolu@intel.com>
>>Subject: Re: FW: draft-ietf-forces-requirements-08

References:
- Re: [iesg-secretary #5788] FW: draft-ietf-forces-requirements-08
  - From: "Jacqueline Hargest" <jhargest@foretec.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [iesg-secretary #5857] proposed addition to RFC 2821
Next by Date: Re: Compendium of "red flags"
Previous by thread: Re: [iesg-secretary #5788] FW: draft-ietf-forces-requirements-08
Next by thread: Re: [iesg-secretary #5857] proposed addition to RFC 2821
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread