[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Document Action: Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF to Informational

This announcement was NOT what was agreed upon. It was VERY IMPORTANT that it was reflected that the question about publication was coming from the RFC-Editor.

The agreement was that IESG tell RFC-Editor that IESG have no objection to having this published. That is something very different than having IESG approving it.

I would never agree to approving this document (without passing it to other parties, including John Klensin). This was also what I said on the call.

Let's hope we don't get an appeal for this.

paf


Begin forwarded message:

From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
Date: fre mar 7, 2003 19:27:08 Europe/Stockholm
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Subject: Fwd: Document Action: Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF to Informational

Hmmm. I'm happy with the wording you told me yesterday ("the IESG has told the RFC Editor that it has no objections to this document being published as an Informational RFC"), and am happy with the wording in the announcement below, but the two wordings are radically different.

Should I bring this issue up with Ted "Post-Patrik" Hardie instead? Is it an IESG issue or an RFC Editor (and therefore IAB) issue?

--Paul

To: IETF-Announce: ;
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Document Action: Terminology Used in Internationalization in
the IETF to Informational
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 19:21:30 -0500
Sender: owner-ietf-announce@ietf.org



The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'Terminology Used in
Internationalization in the IETF' <draft-hoffman-i18n-terms-11.txt>
as an Informational RFC. This has been reviewed in the IETF but is not
the product of an IETF Working Group. The IESG contact persons are
Patrik Faltstrom and Ned Freed.


--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium