Hmmm. I'm happy with the wording you told me yesterday ("the IESG has
told the RFC Editor that it has no objections to this document being
published as an Informational RFC"), and am happy with the wording in
the announcement below, but the two wordings are radically different.
Should I bring this issue up with Ted "Post-Patrik" Hardie instead? Is
it an IESG issue or an RFC Editor (and therefore IAB) issue?
--Paul
To: IETF-Announce: ;
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>, Internet Architecture Board
<iab@iab.org>
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Document Action: Terminology Used in Internationalization in
the IETF to Informational
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 19:21:30 -0500
Sender: owner-ietf-announce@ietf.org
The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'Terminology Used in
Internationalization in the IETF' <draft-hoffman-i18n-terms-11.txt>
as an Informational RFC. This has been reviewed in the IETF but is
not
the product of an IETF Working Group. The IESG contact persons are
Patrik Faltstrom and Ned Freed.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium