--On tirsdag, mars 11, 2003 08:00:42 -0500 Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
us claiming to have an open process for talking about these things requires either that the directorate does nothing external but point to what WGs are relevant, or that the directorate have a default "everything suggested by the directorate will be publicly discussed there" thing.Query: would it make sense to do this the same way as the IRTF WGs do, and pair the limited-membership, clueful-people-only (?) directorate with an open mailing list for discussing the same set of issues?the rirs have those lists up the ying yang. we should not step over on to their turf.