Re: draft-hoffman-i18n-terms-11.txt

[ned.freed@mrochek.com]

This looks OK to me.

				Ned

> Are these changes ok? Can you who help have a look at the abstract as
> well please. It is now the following:
>    This document provides a glossary of terms used in the IETF when
>    discussing internationalization.  The purpose is to help frame
>    discussions of internationalization in the various areas of the IETF
> and
>    to help introduce the main concepts to IETF participants.
> Is this still ok? Or is this text also implying it is *the* glossary
> which must be used for normative references?
>     paf
> Title change:
> OLD:
> Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF
> NEW:
> Terminology Used in Internationalization

> Text change, section 1.1:
> OLD:
> This document gives an overview of internationalization as it applies to
> IETF standards work by lightly covering the many aspects of
> internationalization and the vocabulary associated with those topics.
> It
> is not meant to be a complete description of internationalization.  The
> definitions in this document are not normative for IETF standards;
> however, they are useful and standards may make non-normative reference
> to this document after it becomes an RFC.  Some of the definitions in
> this document come from many earlier IETF documents and books.
> NEW:
> This document gives an overview of internationalization as it applies to
> IETF work in this area by lightly covering many aspects of
> internationalization and the vocabulary associated with those topics.
> It
> is not meant to be a complete description of internationalization.  The
> definitions in this document are purely informative for IETF standards,
> however, they are useful and this document should become a valuable
> resource for the IETF after it becomes an RFC.