RE: FW: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-reqts-07.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

So I believe that this then clears all "DISCUSS" issues
and that the document is herewith approved by the IESG.
Note that this doc was going for Informational, so there
is not a formal DISCUSS to be cleared.

Jacqueline, can you please announce.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven M. Bellovin [mailto:smb@research.att.com]
> Sent: zondag 16 maart 2003 2:41
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Cc: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: FW: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-reqts-07.txt 
> 
> 
> In message 
> <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550115755F@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.c
> om>, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" writes:
> >Steve, also on this one (Informational) you
> >were going to check if there are any security 
> >issues (or at least that is what I have in my notes).
> 
> My apologies for the delay.  On rereading this document, I suspect
> that I confused it with another on the same agenda.  In any event,
> I have no concerns about it.  Jacqueline, please clear my DISCUSS.
>