[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BGP as Draft vs. RFC 2385



I may be just tired, but.....

if we keep whois at draft without specifying how to figure out which character set the data is in, I don't see the problem with having 2385 at draft.

we shipped SNMP to Full without replacing DES.

--On 18. mars 2003 12:53 -0500 "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com> wrote:

In other words, 2385 isn't the weak point for BGP authentication --
there's no real attack against it, and given the path characteristics
it's hard to attack.  But it's not good enough itself for promotion to
DS, in my opinion.