[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: please review rfc-index.xml

To: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: please review rfc-index.xml
From: Andrew Newton <anewton@ecotroph.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:10:34 -0500
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, iab@ietf.org, ietf-xml@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20030319001756.GA23961@isi.edu>
References: <20030319001756.GA23961@isi.edu>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

It would be nice if the XML schema used by the RFC index incorporated all of the element types found in the <reference> element of RFC 2629.

That way citation libraries, like the one at xml.resource.org, could easily generate the XML needed for doing 2629 style draft composition.

-andy

RFC Editor wrote:

Dear IESG, IAB, and XML-directorate-

The RFC Editor has completed an initial release of the RFC index in
XML format.  We would like to request that you review it and send
comments to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  It is temporarily located at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-index.xml.  Once it is ready for public
distribution it will be placed next to rfc-index.txt in the RFC
repository (ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/).

--aaron (for the RFC Editor)

References:
- please review rfc-index.xml
  - From: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>

Prev by Date: Re: BGP as Draft vs. RFC 2385
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: Enhanced Compressed RTP (CRTP) for links with high delay, packet loss and reordering to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: please review rfc-index.xml
Next by thread: Re: please review rfc-index.xml
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread