[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: please review rfc-index.xml

To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: please review rfc-index.xml
From: Andrew Newton <anewton@ecotroph.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:58:17 -0500
Cc: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, iesg@ietf.org, iab@ietf.org, ietf-xml@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030318180109.023a27d8@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com>
References: <Your message of "Tue, 18 Mar 2003 16:17:56 PST." <20030319001756.GA23961@isi.edu> <5.2.0.9.2.20030318180109.023a27d8@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Fred Baker wrote:

I compared the xml2rfc RFC reference library to the RFC descriptions in your file, and it looks like the necessary data is there. Your is more complete, and for bibliographic purposes I think it is an improvement.

After being able to review the XSD, I support this statement and retract my previous comment. The schema is a much richer data model and is complete for bibliographic purposes.

-andy

References:
- please review rfc-index.xml
  - From: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- Re: please review rfc-index.xml
  - From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: question on process
Next by Date: Re: please review rfc-index.xml
Previous by thread: Re: please review rfc-index.xml
Next by thread: Re: please review rfc-index.xml
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread