[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another process question

To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: Another process question
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 08:05:23 -0800
Cc: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, "Iesg (E-mail)" <iesg@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <1301458999.1048142244@localhost>

On torsdag, mar 20, 2003, at 06:37 US/Pacific, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

The good thing is that the overhead of those decisions was low.
The bad thing is that five years down the road, I have no record I can find and point to saying "this is why we did it".

The ones we have done in apps area during my time has always been attached with:

- A discussion like this ;-)
- An informational RFC stating "why"

See for example RFC 3494.

paf

References:
- Re: Another process question
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>

Prev by Date: Re: Another process question
Next by Date: icann now has a contract & we are in it
Previous by thread: Re: Another process question
Next by thread: Re: Another process question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread