RE: Change of ADs on documents

[Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>]

In the security area, I am taking over most of the documents assigned to 
Jeff, but not all of them.  Steve and I have been going through a process 
of assigning the active documents. In fact, we have already handled most of 
them.  Very few are still assigned to Jeff.  I think that our manual 
process is desirable.  It have helped me come up to speed.

Russ

At 06:01 PM 3/24/2003 +0100, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> > as Scott said earlier - I think that for RFCs in "dead",
> > "published" or  "RFC Editor's queue" state, we should not
> > change the responsible AD.
> >
> I agree, and I meant to say all "active documents".
> Should have been more precise.
>
> > For all others, I believe the default should be to change the
> > responsible AD to the one taking over, and the ADs for the area
> > should then go through
> > the list together to see if any need to be changed.
> >
> > Let me look at the lists first - if I find no reason not to,
> > and there are no objections, I'll ask the secretariat to do:
> >
> > - Change all "Jeff Schiller" to "Russ Housley"
> > - Change all "Patrik Faltstrom" to "Ted Hardie"
> > - Change all "Scott Bradner" where area is Sub-IP to "Alex Zinin"
>
> except for GSMP WG, which I took over.
>
> > - Change all other "Scott Bradner" to "Jon Peterson"
> >
> > respecting the list of states above.
> > And I'll expect to ask them to do this on Wednesday of this
> > week, asking them to be finished well before the next telechat.
> >
> > OK with people?
> >
> Modulo my comment about GSMP WG: yes.
>
> Bert
> >               Harald
> >