RE: Preparing to close APEX.

["Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>]

I think they are waiting for the PIDF draft (draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf) to
be revised, and then they want to send that, the MSGFMT draft and the three
core drafts to the IESG in a bundle. There are some dependencies between the
PIDF draft and draft-ietf-impp-pres.

- J

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no]
> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 1:49 AM
> To: Peterson, Jon; Ted Hardie; iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Preparing to close APEX.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --On fredag, mars 28, 2003 04:40:34 -0500 "Peterson, Jon" 
> <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> wrote:
> 
> you're up early :-)
> 
> > I don't think Dave is sabotaging IMPP at the moment. The 
> core documents
> > are past WGLC and he has not made any further comments on the latest
> > versions (which were released before Atlanta) which incorporated
> > amendations to meet his most recent concerns.
> >
> > I think it would be worth it to try to IETF LC the core 
> IMPP documents at
> > this time. Dave might find some new grounds for objection, 
> but then again
> > he might not. Getting those documents out would be 
> beneficial not only to
> > the APEX situation but also to the SIMPLE situation. It is 
> preferable,
> > from my perspective, that we hold all the groups to the 
> IMPP model, as
> > Patrik originally intended.
> >
> > That much said, I don't strongly object to working around 
> this for the
> > APEX presence draft. I just hope we don't also have to work 
> around this
> > for SIMPLE.
> 
> what's standing in the way of an IETF Last Call at the moment?
> 
>                     Harald
>