RE: Evaluation: draft-ietf-atommib-opticalmib - Definitions of Managed Objects for the Optical Interface Type to Proposed Standard

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Steve, can you be specific, I see things like:

optIfOTSnSinkIntervalLastInputPower OBJECT-TYPE
  SYNTAX  Integer32
  UNITS  "0.1 dbm"

So which ones did you see without a UNITs clause?

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven M. Bellovin [mailto:smb@research.att.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 1 april 2003 0:41
> To: IESG Secretary
> Cc: Internet Engineering Steering Group
> Subject: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-atommib-opticalmib - 
> Definitions of
> Managed Objects for the Optical Interface Type to Proposed Standard 
> 
> 
> In message <200303282207.RAA21404@ietf.org>, IESG Secretary writes:
> >
> >                    Yes    No-Objection  Discuss *  Abstain  
> 
> >Steve Bellovin      [   ]     [   ]       [  X ]      [   ] 
> 
> There are a number of entries that monitor power levels, but the unit 
> is never defined.  (This can easily be fixed with an RFC 
> editor's note.)
> 
> 
> 		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
> 		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of 
> "Firewalls" book)
> 
>