[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: : FYI: Site Local
Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com> writes:
>
> > 3.3. Session management
> ...
> > In the case where a consensus which has been reached during a face-
> > to-face meeting is being verified on a mailing list the people who
> > were in the meeting and expressed agreement must be taken into
> > account.
I'm not saying that they shouldn't be taken into account, merely
that simple addition isn't an appropriate metric.
The question we're trying to ask is (roughly):
What fraction of the WG is in favor of this change?
We have two samples, both taken with seriously non-random sampling
methodologies. There's an extensive literature about how to combine
such studies (the procedure is called meta-analysis) but simple
addition can't be used unless the two samples were taken with roughly
commensurate methodologies.
-Ekr