Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no] writes:
I'm happy with this version; I think it explains the
situation wrt the
packet type codes well.
The "situation" as I understand it is that people have appropriated type
codes, ignoring IETF process. This situation continues w/the Chivba
draft & all this draft does is try to justify these violations, both
after and before the fact. The right thing to do in this document (if
we're really interested in interoperability, rather than some type of
organizational exercise in CYA) is to reserve the proprietary,
unassigned type codes (including those used by the Chiba draft) pending
a standards-track document fully describing their usage.