[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another IESG Charter revision

To: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
Subject: Re: Another IESG Charter revision
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 14:09:06 -0500
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: Message from zinin@psg.com of "Tue, 08 Apr 2003 12:02:23 PDT." <10113237454.20030408120223@psg.com>

Hi Alex.

>   I would say we just use our judgement to chose which documents
>   to take, and let the NomCom fix the bugs if they are so huge, as
>   we do with BOF, for example. We seem to be getting too deep into
>   potential procedural/political aspects, but we should also be
>   able to just do the right thing... my 2 kopeikas...

I tend to agree. But, note, just what the "right thing" is has in some
sense become a political question. :-(

Thomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another IESG Charter revision
  - From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>

References:
- Re: Another IESG Charter revision
  - From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Last Call: Textual Conventions for IPv6 Flow Label to Pro posed Standard
Next by Date: Re: Another IESG Charter revision
Previous by thread: Re: Another IESG Charter revision
Next by thread: Re: Another IESG Charter revision
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread