In message <200304021953.OAA25577@ietf.org>, IESG Secretary writes: > >Last Call to expire on: 2003-1-30 > > Please return the full line with your position. > > Yes No-Objection Discuss * Abstain > > >Steve Bellovin [ ] [ ] [ X ] [ ] In Section 2.5, we don't think we want to permit a variable number of rounds for AES -- NIST explicitly declined to do so because it interacts with the key schedule generation. Beyond that, I don't see that 5.4.1 should exist at all. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me) http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)