[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-05.txt
- To: iesg <iesg@ietf.org>
- Subject: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-05.txt
- From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:23:09 -0700
what the heck, for the moment call this a discuss
randy
---
From: ops-dir
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>,ops directorate <ops-dir@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-05.txt
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 17:27:49 -0400
At 09:23 PM 4/11/2003 -0400, Randy Bush wrote:
>***** o Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching Architecture
> (Proposed Standard)
> <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-05.txt>
> Token: Wijnen, Bert
> Note: IETF Last Call requested.
> Responsible: Bert
didn't read the whole thing my head hurts but this seems like
a good argument for the ietf to jettison mpls and call it the
mpls-forum... maybe scoya as 'business development weenie'
for foretec might want to take it on :-)
one immediate question comes to mind ... they talk of a link
management protocl (lmp) (eg in chap 8) it seems to do just
about what ppp does. the obvious question is 'why not use
ppp?'